from NDSU Press Publisher, Suzzanne Kelley
NDSU Press “shall not upload the Work or any of Author’s personal information to consumer-facing AI systems for purposes such as generating summaries, assessments, or marketing copy.” And, NDSU Press “agrees that it will not use AI to edit a manuscript, other than for the use of basic spelling and grammar-checking applications. Further, NDSU Press warrants that any textual or art changes it proposes will not have been created by AI.”
Such matters of ethics have been in flux in the publishing world, and we appreciate the forthrightness of the above statements delivered today from an informational group we keep up with called Publishers Lunch. The text comes from “Today’s Meal,” which shares recommendations from the Authors Guild in regard to manuscripts and AI tools.
![]()
The concern as expressed in Today’s Meal follows reports that professionals are “uploading manuscripts and authors’ personal information into consumer-facing AI systems for uses such as generating summaries, assessments, and marketing copy.” The ethical practice of refraining from use of such systems avoids the potential of having original content used by AI companies for training and/or contributing to AI-generated content.
In addition to practices in acquisition and marketing, we are working on a similar ethics statement to use in our contracts to ensure that authors are likewise contributing only original content. In consultation with our copyrights attorney, we find that at present such a statement seems to be a moving target, hard to set in a fixed format just yet. So, for now, we stick to our present contract terms, which state in brief: “Author will be the sole author of the Work [and] the Work is original with Author.”
Follow this link If you’d like to subscribe to Publishers Lunch (it’s free!).
















